![]() RyanSmithAT: Photos like these are why I'm envious of proper workstations.An hour later I'm still playing Super Stardust Delta. RyanSmithAT: I found my PS Vita while cleaning house today.RyanSmithAT: Fitting that Delta is the last version that made though (PS4/Ultra was an outside studio).Reported capacity to the OS would match the advertised one, but attempting to… RyanSmithAT: Rant of the day: could websites please accurately report file type/MIME settings with images? I'm getting tired of….gavbon86: A great idea in practice, but going to need a suitable chassis for it □□….Get him to offer me the world after he's had a bag or 20 Depends on how well the concept takes off. gavbon86: Unless it becomes a regular feature, it's all IF right now.gavbon86: I believe ASUS will be developing/has already developed a case, as tweeted.In fact, I used the same ASUS Crosshair V Formula motherboard I used last year (with a much newer BIOS) for today's review:įor more comparisons be sure to check out our performance database: Bench. Most Socket-AM3+ motherboards on the market today should support the new parts with nothing more than a BIOS update. All of the FX processors remain unlocked and ship fully featured with hardware AES acceleration enabled. The chart below shows where AMD expects all of these CPUs to do battle:ĪMD's targets are similar to what they were last time: Intel's Core i5 and below. While the FX-8150 debuted at $245, the 8350 drops that price to $199 putting it around $40 less than the Core i5 3570K. It's also important to note that AMD's pricing this time around is far more sensible. The table above supports that characterization. In our Trinity notebook review I called the new CPU core Bulldozed Tuned. The 6 and 4 core versions get boosts to both sides, without increasing TDP. Across the board Vishera ships at higher base frequencies than the equivalent Zambezi part, but without increasing max turbo frequency (in the case of the 8-core parts). TDPs haven't changed, cache sizes haven't changed and neither have core counts. The new lineup is in the table below: CPU Specification Comparison Piledriver is a bit more power efficient than Bulldozer, which enables AMD to drive Vishera's frequency up while remaining in the same thermal envelope as Zambezi. These chips are obviously much larger than Intel's 22nm Ivy Bridge parts, but Intel has a full node advantage there which enables that. Cache sizes remain the same as well, which keeps everything roughly the same. ![]() Piledriver is a light evolution over Bulldozer, so there's actually no substantial increase in die area compared to the previous generation. As a fabless semiconductor manufacturer, AMD is now at GF's mercy when it comes to moving process technology forward. Vishera is still built on the same 32nm GlobalFoundries SOI process as Zambezi, which means there isn't much room for additional architectural complexity without ballooning die area, and not a whole lot of hope for significantly decreasing power consumption. Clock speeds and TDPs are also up compared to Trinity. ![]() While Trinity had to worry about working nicely in a laptop, Vishera is strictly a high-end desktop/workstation part. This is the same CPU core that is used in Trinity, but it's optimized for a very different purpose here in Vishera. Brazos had a mild update, Llano paved the way for Trinity which is now shipping, and around a year after Zambezi's launch we have Vishera: the Piledriver based AMD FX successor.Īt a high level, Vishera swaps out the Bulldozer cores from Zambezi and replaces them with Piledriver. As promised we've now had multiple generations of each platform ship from AMD. It's been a rough road for AMD over these past few years, but you have to give credit where it's due: we haven't seen AMD executing this consistently in quite a while. To make matters worse, before AMD could rev Bulldozer, Intel already began shipping Ivy Bridge - a part that not only increased performance but decreased power consumption as well. The performance advantage that Intel enjoyed at the time was beyond what could be erased by a single generation. My hope is that future derivatives of the FX processor (perhaps based on Piledriver) will boast much more aggressive Turbo Core frequencies, which would do wonders at eating into that advantage." "Single threaded performance is my biggest concern, and compared to Sandy Bridge there's a good 40-50% advantage the i5 2500K enjoys over the FX-8150. In our conclusion to last year's FX-8150 review I wrote the following: Look beyond the direct AMD comparison and the situation looked even worse. The Bulldozer CPU cores that were bundled into each Zambezi chip were hardly power efficient and in many areas couldn't significantly outperform AMD's previous generation platform. Last year's launch of AMD's FX processors was honestly disappointing. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |